RSS
热门关键字:
当前位置 :| Home>Market Analysis>

Doing not have room source other is completely it is theoretic where is the hous

来源: 作者:Stand originally 时间:2009-01-06 Tag: 点击:
Land of ministry of land natural resources uses Shu Kexin of administrative department vice director 22 days to walk along the introduction on situation and forum of industrial development high level in macroscopical economy of the 3rd China at present property right of American city housing has oneself leading is 68% , england is 56% , property right of housing of city of European other country has oneself rate be in about 30% to 50% between. According to the figure that announces about the branch, at present urban housing property right has our country oneself leading is 82% the left and right sides. He thinks, policy of our country housing is oriented cannot encourage everybody only purely to buy a house, should adjust policy to direct, in advocating, low income family hires a room to live. (" Shenzhen business signs up for " on July 23)

Guide town dweller health reasonable consumption is really significant, bundle the vice director is advocated in the proposal that low income family hires a room to live is very pretty good also, but, I think, bundle the vice director made a logistic mistake, this is, rent a house must should assure room source above all, and, the expense that the place that rent a house takes must compare the be to one's profit that buy a house, such, ability implementation hires the target that the house lives. The problem is, whether do we have enough room to offer the person that rent a house, if do not have a house to be able to be hired, or chummage is more expensive, did not buy room be to one's profit, so, "The plan that rent a house " come to nothing likely.

According to the figure that announces about the branch, at present urban housing property right has our country oneself leading is 82% the left and right sides, do not know this number has water share, if do not have, how much is the person place of hold property right holds social population proportion? If house property counterpoises,achieve from what have forthright and sincere 82% the left and right sides, so, mere whether can the person buy a house of 18% raise a mighty uproar in estate market, create estate market today's tight situation? Apparent, the face has feline dirt here.

Bundle of the vice director " the plan that rent a house " it is to stand in housing property right to have leading is the conversation on the foundation of 82% oneself, that is to say, bundle the vice director is right of the dweller have housing oneself " was full of confidence " . I also think, since of the dweller oneself housing level is achieved such tall, far " drive Ying Chaomei " , so, we also should capable to solve the rest the 18% housing problems that do not have room a group of things with common features. Such intensity is supplied in land, below the high case with room such value, rent a house of course the plan of first selection of can yet be regarded as.

But, why to people likes to buy a house and like to rent a house? It is traditional idea idea admittedly on one hand the living habit in or so people, on the other hand, do not have a house to be able to be hired, saying exactly should be to do not have appropriate house can be hired, also be a main factor. Although urban housing property right has oneself,leading is 82% , but, the house that which have townsman to you can offer daily life of a domesticity more so is rental? If have a large number of such house is rental, can show an issue only, the house had property right to arrive centrally in the small number of people's hand oneself, housing property right has oneself rate 82% it is a bubble, more people still do not have his house, so, inextricability still housing consumes structural issue.
最新评论共有 0 位网友发表了评论
发表评论
评论内容:不能超过250字,需审核,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
用户名: 密码:
匿名?
注册